Comments on: Nano Sucker http://the.lostrealm.com/archives/2005/11/20/nanosucker/ I don't know -- it's all geek to me Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:20:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Lionfire http://the.lostrealm.com/archives/2005/11/20/nanosucker/comment-page-1/#comment-156 Lionfire Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:49:36 +0000 http://the.lostrealm.com/?p=384#comment-156 Any project designed and imlemented in a day is classy by definition :) Of course, that was originally just a test message, but between liking it and being tired -- things are always much funnier when one is tired -- it never did get replaced. Any project designed and imlemented in a day is classy by definition :)

Of course, that was originally just a test message, but between liking it and being tired — things are always much funnier when one is tired — it never did get replaced.

]]> By: Ezra http://the.lostrealm.com/archives/2005/11/20/nanosucker/comment-page-1/#comment-155 Ezra Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:02:16 +0000 http://the.lostrealm.com/?p=384#comment-155 I've just been presented with the message: "YOU ARE TEH SUXX0RS" Classy. :-) I’ve just been presented with the message:

“YOU ARE TEH SUXX0RS”

Classy. :-)

]]> By: Lionfire http://the.lostrealm.com/archives/2005/11/20/nanosucker/comment-page-1/#comment-152 Lionfire Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:27:13 +0000 http://the.lostrealm.com/?p=384#comment-152 Okay, thanks to the wonders of VC++6, we're now completely ignoring the fact that VC++8 and XP manifests are really stupid. Do enjoy a working version. Okay, thanks to the wonders of VC++6, we’re now completely ignoring the fact that VC++8 and XP manifests are really stupid.

Do enjoy a working version.

]]> By: Lionfire http://the.lostrealm.com/archives/2005/11/20/nanosucker/comment-page-1/#comment-151 Lionfire Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:29:29 +0000 http://the.lostrealm.com/?p=384#comment-151 Darn it. You're the second person to get that error. After all of our... er... five minutes of testing. On two computers. I believe it's something to do with a missing DLL (despite the error message). We'll have a look at it later today and get an updated version out. In the meantime, someone managed to get it to work by installing .NET 2.0. See, kids -- this is what happens when you don't design your algorithms and document your code :) Darn it. You’re the second person to get that error.

After all of our… er… five minutes of testing. On two computers.

I believe it’s something to do with a missing DLL (despite the error message). We’ll have a look at it later today and get an updated version out. In the meantime, someone managed to get it to work by installing .NET 2.0.

See, kids — this is what happens when you don’t design your algorithms and document your code :)

]]> By: Russell Keith-Magee http://the.lostrealm.com/archives/2005/11/20/nanosucker/comment-page-1/#comment-150 Russell Keith-Magee Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:40:19 +0000 http://the.lostrealm.com/?p=384#comment-150 Hrm... Might want to look at that one a bit more... The installer runs, but the game don't. :-) "This application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem." Russ %-) Hrm…

Might want to look at that one a bit more… The installer runs, but the game don’t. :-)

“This application has failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem.”

Russ %-)

]]>